Microneedling vs Botox: A Face-off for Healthy Skin

3 min read

Microneedling and Botox are two of the hottest trends in aesthetics, but what sets them apart?

It’s helpful to know that both services work in different ways to address different skin concerns.

Microneedling, a minimally invasive procedure, involves using tiny needles to create controlled micro-injuries in the skin. This stimulates the body's natural healing process, leading to increased collagen and elastin production, which helps improve skin texture, firmness, and overall appearance. Microneedling treats acne scars, wrinkles, sun damage, large pores, and stretch marks.

A study published in the Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy found that repeated microneedling procedures increased collagen and elastin production in the skin by up to 400% after 6 months [Source: Journal of Cosmetic and Laser Therapy] - that's some serious superhero strength!

On the other hand, Botox or Dysport are neuromodulators injected into specific muscles to temporarily relax them. By relaxing the muscles, Botox can reduce the appearance of wrinkles and fine lines caused by repetitive facial expressions, such as frown lines, crow's feet, and forehead lines. Botox is primarily used for dynamic wrinkles, which are wrinkles that appear when muscles contract.

While both microneedling and Botox enhance skin appearance, microneedling focuses on stimulating collagen production and improving skin texture by utilizing one’s own natural healing. Botox addresses fine lines and wrinkles by targeting muscle movement.

The choice between Botox and microneedling depends on individual skin concerns and desired outcomes. Consult with our knowledgeable and experienced Nurse Practitioner, Noorin, to determine the best-suited treatment for your skin needs.


This post was written by wellbe’s Nurse Practitioner, Noorin. Ready to give microneedling a try? Click here to book your first session!